Search for: "Does 1-149" Results 1 - 20 of 916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A review of 149 federal agencies found that only 1 in 5 posts on its Web site all the records required and that even fewer -- 6 percent -- tell people how to request what does not appear there. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:07 am
Pringle, 255 Conn. 330, 354, 766 A.2d 400 (2001), holding that the trial court does not have subject matter jurisdiction in a case controlled by § 13a-149 if the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient notice to the defendant municipality. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
The claims of '463, ‘258, and '976 patents with the exception of claim 4 of ‘149 patent were generally treated as a single group.Claim 1 of ‘463 patent was considered representative and it states: 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
The report outlines four overriding objectives to achieve the recommendations including: 1. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
L. c. 149, § 148B, does not determine whether an injured worker is an “employee” for the purpose of workers’ comp benefits under G. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[149] We find that the statement that the firm specialized in real estate is accurate and does not breach the rule. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly, we conclude that the claims of the ’463 patent are invalid as obvious.HOWEVER, Sandoz was not so successful as to the '149 patent:The district court also found that claim 4 of the ’149 patent was not invalid as obvious. [read post]
6 May 2013, 4:33 pm
And where does the border between method of use and result or property of a method of use lie? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:35 am by Derek T. Muller
" It does not give "full weight" in its metrics to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Charles Mayer Studios, Inc., 177 USPQ 149, 153 n.5 (TTAB 1973). [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Statutory interpretation- s.55(1) requires an authorisation to do acts related to a patented invention, which is more than an authorisation to do acts ([149]).- s.55(6) provides the possibility of retrospective authorisation. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:17 pm by Stewart Baker
 Send an email to CyberlawPodcast@steptoe.com or leave a message at +1 202 862 5785. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 10:17 am by Sean Hanover
Laws Ann. ch. 149, § 52C) and California (Cal. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:31 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
  In addition, a taxpayer who does a conversion in 2010 can pay the tax due from the conversion in 2011 and 2012 (by including 50% of the conversion income in each year). [read post]